Home
Stock Information
Stock Quote
Historic Prices
Dividends
Dividend Tax Information
D/R & Stock Purchase Plan
Series B Pfd. Stock Conversion
Financial Calculators
News & Market Data
News Articles
Presentations
Events Calendar
Covering Analysts
Press Releases
SEC FIlings
Documents
Insider Filings
Insider Ownership
Institutional Ownership
Financial Information
Financial Highlights
As Reported Financial Statements
Corporate Overview
Directors & Officers
Governance Documents
Committee Structure
Other Information
Information Request Form
Email Notification
Contact Us
FAQ
IR Site Map
Entire IR Site
Documents
Press Releases
Institutional Ownership
Ir Menu
Ownership > 100%
Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation did not extract, prepare or compile the data/information shown on this web page and expressly disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the data/information contained herein.
Copyright
,
© Powered By Q4 Inc.
Ownership > 100%
List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:
Double-counting
- On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.
Short Interest
- A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.
A gap between 'as of' dates
- In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.
Other possible reasons:
a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions;
b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues;
c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.